26
Jul

When it comes to Copper Country exploring there’s a level of rarity to everything you find along the way. The most common site is the poor rock pile, every mine has at least one and you’ll never find a mine site without one. Next up would be the hoist foundation, a common “H” shaped behemoth whose own size and gait insured its survival past all other buildings at a mine site. This would be followed by the smokestack – the base of which you are sure to find at most mines – the compressor house, and rock house. Then you get to the more “rare” finds, such as the ever reclusive boiler house.

Then there’s those extremely rare finds that only happen once in a hundred explorations – things that are almost a miracle that you find at all. At the top of this list is any piece of steam equipment that was utilized by the mines in the pursuit of their copper riches. These iron contraptions were decimated by the scrapping drives that ascended down on the peninsula during the great wars. Any hoist, compressor, or boiler that had managed to survive their abandonment were cut up and sent out of the area. Because of this its a very rare find to uncover any piece of steam equipment still intact and even more rare to find it intact in its original habitat. That’s why today’s find blew my mind. It was a boiler!

The rare gem was sitting alone within the ruins of the Superintendent’s house, which seemed to be as unlikely place as any to find such a piece of machinery. When we first found it I had thought we had also found the mine’s boiler house – for I couldn’t think of any other application for it except in a boiler house. But after getting back home and realizing that the building in which we had found it was once the mine’s superintendents house it made sense. As an important and powerful man at the mine, the superintended would have been provided only the best. This meant steam heat, a benefit usually provided by the company’s own boiler plant. But since mines of the Delaware’s age usually didn’t utilize a centralized steam plant (and instead used several boiler houses each attached to a specific purpose), this house received its very own boiler.

Compared to the boiler we had previously found at the Gratiot River this particular model seemed remarkable small, but in actuality this was probably the size you would expect to find at a mine from this time period. Most boilers from this time period would have been of the Cornish type, a category this model might also fall under. At the boiler’s back end (at least in relation to how we came across it) sits the fire box, the area where coal was burned to create heat.

Cornish boilers were of the fire tube type, which mean hot gases from the firebox would flow throw several tubes placed inside the water chamber. A look inside the firebox reveals those fire tubes, which present themselves as a series of round openings running across the back of the fire box. From here those tubes would make their way forward to the smoke box, the hot gases being pulled forward by a natural draft created by an attached chimney or flue.

Here’s that flue in question, which is now just a round opening at the boiler’s opposite end. Normally this opening would have been tied to a chimney or stack. My guess in this application the boiler would have been tied to the houses’s main chimney somehow.

A look inside that flue opening reveals the opposite end of those fire tubes as they make their way out to the smoke box.

Back from the flue opening sits this interesting detail. I have no idea what this was for but it looks to be some type of valve or opening into the water chamber. Perhaps a pressure release valve of some type?

Further back we have the steam dome, or at least a very bad picture of one. From here steam would have been siphoned off to be used in the house, probably for use in the house’s radiators I would assume.

Atop the steam dome sits this odd flange type thing. No idea what it was for, except that it was most likely related to that steam siphoning process mentioned earlier.

Nearby we find a few small diameter pipes making their way away from the boiler. I believe these were water pipes and not steam pipes. They weren’t connected to the steam dome, but were instead attached down near the boiler’s base.

Before leaving the boiler behind we had some questions. The most pressing was how this boiler remained here – intact and in one piece – for the last hundred years without being scrapped while everything else in the area was taken. While its possible that the scrappers didn’t think to look inside a house for one, this particular ruin sits right alongside the road. You’d think someone would have at least peeked inside to see what was here.

But I suppose the real reason for this was a simple case of longevity. While the mine structures nearby would have been abandoned along with the mine and left to ruin, this house might have been occupied for many decades after the fact. I suppose its possible that when the scrappers came knocking, someone still lived in this house and it was not in ruins like the rest of the surrounding structures. I suppose its also possible that someone was still using the boiler to heat the house. Either way the boiler was protected by circumstance, allowing us to find it still here over a century later. I won’t complain.


34 Responses to “A Rare Find”


Herb July 26, 2010

Interesting post. Is this ruin in the line of houses along the main highway near Delaware or on a sideroad?

I’ve often wondered how much stuff got left underground because it was too expensive to haul it out. And then of course the mines filled with water and it was out of reach.

Charles July 26, 2010

Probably a correct assumption as to how this boiler was saved from the scrappers. Did you see any old radiators about? Maybe the scrappers took them but failed to look in the basement!

Henry in Troy July 26, 2010

One note about the scrapping is that athe iron or steel parts are there but there would have been brass and copper parts that are not. Looks like some of the scrappers did want the red metal. In photo 2, the 3 holes on the right are for the tri-cocks, used to determine the water level. When the water level in a boiler goes below the crown or top sheet inside the the firebox, bad things happen. The holes on the boiler front on the left side may be for a waterglass, also to check the level. Photo 6 shows a manway opening that is used during maintenance and for the initial water filling. The pictures of the steam dome, photos 7 and 8, show two openings on top. One is probably for steam for heating and the other is for a safety valve. The safety valve opens when the pressure in the boiler gets too high. If this does not happen, bad things do. Photo 9 looks like part of a vacuum breaker. When the steam and/or hot water in the heat pipes cool down, a vacuum develops and the pipes in the house don’t like that. One question is the location of the water pump or injector inlet to the boiler. The tri-cocks and water glass tell you how much water you have in the boiler and a gauge tells you how much pressure. Having a way to put more water in the boiler, and maybe to cool it down, is very important.

Charles Dawley July 26, 2010

well, maybe it was just small picking compared to the rest of the metal laying around.

Sean the Hiker July 26, 2010

Photo #5 appears to have some preformed asbestos insulation in the base of the cavity (the white stuff). In the event that anyone finds this kind of stuff in a house or structure – leave it alone. If left undisturbed, it is relatively harmless, even in its severely damaged condition. Be careful that none of this material comes home or goes in your car on your shoes as well. Cool post!

ccexplorer July 27, 2010

Henry – thanks for the detailed info on the boiler, its a subject I’m not too familiar on myself (thought I’m getting better each time I find one) but your knowledge really fills in the blanks for the rest of us! (so by all means keep it up!)

Charles – There was a variety of other iron items laying about as well, so I’m pretty sure that the building was standing and in use during those scrapping drives. It was abandoned much later I would assume.

Herb – This guy sits along Delaware Crosscut Road (I think that’s its name) just around the corner from the mine entrance. Its not along the highway with the rest of those houses.

Joe Dase July 27, 2010

Herb,
Probably about 90% of the equipment in the copper country was left underground. Too expensive to hoist, and most of the time the work stopages were thought to be temporary.

Charles July 27, 2010

Maybe someday it will be of archeological value to dewater a mine and pull out some of the items, the equipment is probably perfectly preserved. Great place to toss a time capsule!

Herb July 27, 2010

In one of the copper country books — can’t recall which — tells of a Michigan Tech fraternity that back in the 1960s or so salvaged a piece of steam equipment from one of the mines. Don’t recall the mine but I’ll look it up. It was a big task and the machinery was put on display somewhere up there. Probably there still….

In a way the waterfilled mines with their contents of old mining equipment is something like a sunken shipwreck. Interesting to think about what might be in the vast underground caverns such as the Cliff Mine or Minesota Mine that had an extensive early history.

Cool to think about….

dc July 27, 2010

Herb — that was Sigma Rho. The steam engine is actually still on display (and reasonably well-kept) in front of their house in Chassell. Really! I believe that they found it while “just exploring some of the lower levels”. Their advisor called up C&H (who owned the land at the time), and C&H even sent over a guy to help them get it out — in the middle of winter. What a different world!

One version of the story is here: http://www.sigmarho.org/the_fraternity/house_and_grounds/mine_hoist/

It’s interesting that the shaft they used for access is the one covered by the Big Blue Bat Cage nowadays.

Jay Balliet July 27, 2010

Here’s the story of the hoist recovery…
http://www.deltaforge.com/minehoist/

Jay Balliet July 27, 2010

You just beat me to it Dave. :)

dc July 28, 2010

HaHA… I win!!

Although Jay’s link is a different page, and the details included are a bit different there. Both reads are neat. I still can’t imagine hauling out heavy steam equipment in the middle of winter. They even RE-laid track in the shaft to get it out!

Jay Balliet July 28, 2010

I was actually looking for the link you posted.

ROC July 28, 2010

You sure that thing is a boiler and not a German U-Boat laying in wait for one of our stone boats to pass by?

Dale Beitz July 28, 2010

She’s not very water-tight for a U-boat, what with the big square opening on one end and that one short conning tower without a hatch on it. And I don’t think I’ve ever seen a sub with that many very tiny torpedo tubes!

ROC July 28, 2010

It doesn’t take a very big torpedo to sink a stone boat.The old girl may have been overgunned with that many tubes.

dc July 28, 2010

Of course, this would be a 100+ year old U-Boat… they were primitive back then.

Bill In Indiana July 30, 2010

There is a WW1 U=Boat sunk in Lake Michigan…

http://www.atrecovery.com/Pages/GermanUBoat.htm

Paul H. Meier August 2, 2010

Hello again,

C&H bought the most of the property around the Delaware Mine circa 1900. The old superintendent’s (agent’s) house was used as a club house by the C&H Gun Club. They kept it up for hunting and fishing outings and it saw heavy use while the Keweenaw Central RR was in operation (1906-18). I suspect there was some sort of fee to keep it all legal but it was probably a nominal $1 per month or year. All part of the paternalism model “historians” find so evil. I suspect this use continued into the 1930’s and of course automobiles were the choice of transportation from Calumet. The house was was available to members for uses other than hunting as my maternal grandparents spent part of their honeymoon there. The house remained intact until the 1960’s when it burned down under suspicious circumstances. That is why the boiler survived.

Paul

ccexplorer August 5, 2010

Thanks Paul, that answers quite a bit of questions I had about this building. Its interesting to see that it served other uses after its retirement from mine duty. Once thing that surely saves buildings and old boilers from destruction is some type of continued use. Too bad more buildings couldn’t have been blessed with similar fates.

Your paternalism comment is intriguing, as I have come to the conclusion as well that the CC’s flavor of paternalism has been given a bad rap as of late. Not to say that it didn’t have its negative aspects, just that it also had its positive aspects as well.

dc August 5, 2010

Interestingly, there are photos over at the Cliff Mine blog of (apparently) a tube boiler similar to this one, buried deep in the debris of the #4 engine house.

Luke August 12, 2010

That’s what’s going on at Adventure. They are finding old artifacts preserved in time as they de-water. They could probably pay for the work by selling artifacts if they wanted to. You could make good money selling old timbers. There’s an entire old-growth forest stored underwater across the CC!

Dale Beitz August 12, 2010

I’ve seen documentaries on TV describing companies that are diving to recover sunken logs from lakes and rivers where logging companies used to float them from the cutting site to the sawmill. So in theory you could do the same with timbers from flooded mines. But what would be the effect of taking out the support structures? Wouldn’t you have stopes starting to collapse? I know if you have stopes near the surface that collapse you see subsidence on the surface, but if you took all the timber out of all the levels of (say) a 1000 foot deep mine, would you notice anything on the surface?

And second, any metallic artifacts recovered would need to be preserved or they would immediately start to rust and corrode. As the folk who raised the HL Hunley can tell you, it costs money to preserve metal that’s been underwater for 100 years or more. While I’m all for historic preservation, getting someone to pay for it can be a significant iseue.

Bill In Indiana August 12, 2010

Visions of that old movie “Paint Your Wagon” come to mind, especially the scene near the end when the tunnels collapse and the town caves in on itself.

ROC August 12, 2010

The C&H and Tamarack Mines would be the big timber producers,not sure how many board feet per ton of timbers mined you would get.When the Atlantic Mines hanging wall gave way it made the RR tracks at the surface look like a snake.Hate to see the steets of Calumet look like that.But I doubt the EPA would ever allow those mines to be pumped out with all that methane containing corrosive heavy salt water being dumped into Lake Superior again.Before C&H claimed it just sank to the bottom of the lake.

Luke August 13, 2010

I was always curious what they did under Calumet when they robbed the pillars. I’m talking about the end of life for the main C&H. Maybe they replaced those pillars with timber? I haven’t read of any sink holes in Calumet.

Now water is a better support than air. Surely some timbers in old mines have fallen down, so you have to wonder if cave-ins would happen in less stable mines just from de-watering. With the hoisting equipment gone, you also have the challenge of hauling the logs up.

But if you found a 300 year old maple tree, preserved for 100 years underwater, wouldn’t somebody pay for classic birds-eye pattern furniture?

Ian August 13, 2010

I’m sure it would be possible to remove the wood supports from the old mines, you’d just have to find a substitute for the timbers after they were taken out. I.E., simple steel columbs? Or maybe only remove half the timbers from each level could be removed? Then you would refill it with poor rock after work’s completed on each level?

Hey, if its worth it to dive to the bottom of the Great Lakes and bring up old timbers, it would be worth it to go into mines and do the same. The problem is balancing the worth of the timbers with the need to comply with safety regulations, the EPA, and the structural principles of a mine.

Bill In Indiana August 13, 2010

Water is most likely acting to hold things up. The hydraulic pressure is helping hold rock in place. De-watering and then de-timbering would seem to be a perfect formula for collapse.

Joe Dase August 13, 2010

Actually the timbers may not be holding anything up in the C&H lode; they would shoot the timbers and let the hanging wall collapse when they robbed the pillars. When the hanging wall collapses, the abutment stress is reduced on the next mining horizon because the pressure above is relieved. Also timbers aren’t met to hold anything up, they are passive support (meaning the ground must deflect before they become effective) and also were used for work platforms. Now if they are taking weight you couldn’t remove them easily without being squashed like a bug!

The problem with dewatering is waters ability to loosen joint sets. Any naturally cemented joints can have their bond weakened by the water; also any un-cemented joints can build water behind them. If the water becomes trapped and you dewater you have a differential head which helps to work the rock loose, and then you have big problems.

We actually used to pull allot of timbers out of shafts before they were capped, especially the few that require dewatering, its beautiful timber!

On a side note, the EPA doesn’t have anything to do if your discharge point is above grade. The only permits you need are from the State of Michigan, but you would probably still need a treatment plant. I know way more than I want to on mine water discharge and the relationship between the EPA and mining companies!

ROC August 13, 2010

Maybe you could install roof bolts and than pull the timbers on the retreating system.The jackpot would be if you did find some old growth Birdseye Maple.It’s up there.I was amazed that one of the old log cabins on the tour at Victoria has a Birdseye-Tiger Maple floor.Can’t even guess what that would cost today.

Joe Dase August 17, 2010

Thats what I think would have to happen, rok bolts and cable bolts and lots of them! But to be honest there probably isn’t much left for timber in the stopes, as it all would have crushed out and been shot out! (Especially when they pulled the shaft pillars!)

On a side note, the floors in my house (which was a 1870’s mine captain’s house in its first life) are about 60% Birds Eye. The family that owened it after the mining company was a weathly local family and built on to it several times, turns otu they put in the birds eye floors. Its all narrow slat, but its beautiful stuff that I wouldn’t blow that much money on installing!

ROC August 17, 2010

Another rare find,birds eye maple flooring.At least two houses in copper country have it.Antiques Road Show appraisis birds eye cabinets at a premium.Wonder what they would think of a whole floor of it?$$$

Joe Dase August 18, 2010

No Doubt! I spoke with some of the guys doing the floor installation at our office, and he told me that there was an old home here in the MQT area, in a very wealthy area that had a Birds Eye Floor. He brought this company in to rip it up and put in marble tile. They tried to get him to leave it, and he said he didn’t like the look, so they destroyed it… Some people!

In my house we are getting ready to tear out the carpet in the living room and dining room… Its mapel underneath also, the same vintage as the upstairs so I am anxious to see if there is any birdseye downstairs as well!