29
Jan

After four years of exploring the Copper Country the moments where I find something that truly amazes me are starting to become scarce. Once you’ve seen a couple dozen rockhouse remains you’re not exactly excited by the 25th one. But in those waning moments of light at the Franklin Jr. it was a massive free-standing wall rising up through the trees that truly took my breath away – a rare event to be sure. But don’t just take my word for it, have a look for yourself…

Whatever it was, the rock wall towering above us was definitely massive. Built out of the same red conglomerate rock as was everything else at the Franklin Jr., this particular structure looked to be part of a wall from an old building. Its position along the east end of the boiler house seemed to suggest that it belonged to that building, but a lack of windows or openings along its breadth seemed odd.

Making our way around the wall we notice that it was actually in the shape of an inverted “L”, some 12 feet deep and a couple dozen feet in length. Running along its edge was a groove, which looked to have once held the end of a wood-framed wall (the boiler house perhaps?)

Inside the “L” the wall was embellished with a series of iron “strips” running vertically up its surface. These “strips” could also of been steel beams set into the rock wall itself, but we couldn’t be sure.

Looking up towards the top of those “strips” we find what looked like some type of bracket. It looked as if the wall might not of been a wall at all, but perhaps a pedestal on top of which something else was attached. Continuing north from the wall would take us to a our answer….

It was there that we found the twisted remains of a steal beam, perfectly in line with our wall. This beam most likely belonged to a trestle, more specifically the coal trestle which fed into the boiler house.

Here’s another shot of the beam in question, this one showing its placement at the corner of a rock rubble foundation wall. This wall’s location would correspond to the boiler house’s north-east corner – exactly where the coal trestle entered the building.

To further back up our theory that the wall was part of the boiler house’s coal trestle was the presence of this earthen approach ramp sitting just north of the boiler house foundation. Like the twisted trestle beam, it too was also in line with the “L” shaped wall in question.

Here’s a plan view of the boiler house complex, with the “L” shaped wall, steel beam, and earthen approach all superimposed over it. Looking at this there’s no doubt that the wall in question was part of the boiler house, specifically the back wall of the structures coal bins. The old coal trestle would have ran up the approach ramp over the beam and along the top of the “L” shaped wall. Inside the wall would have sat the coal bins, now long since destroyed.

With one mystery solved, however, another raises its ambiguous head. Attached to the south end of that coal trestle wall was this interesting specimen. It appears to be a foundation wall for some type of building, one that happened to have been attached to the end of the trestle. At first I thought this was possibly the coal bins themselves, with those window openings actually being coal loading doors. But with closer inspection I now doubt that was the case.

Turns out this particular building is in fact marked on the old Sanborn maps of this surface plant (you can also see it on my drawing from above). Though the maps don’t reveal the structure’s purpose, its position outside of the boiler room makes its identity as a coal bin suspect. It had to have some other purpose.

Whatever that purpose might have been, the foundation’s concrete construction reveals it to be a more recent addition to the boiler complex. The inclusion of windows makes me think it might have had some human purpose, and wasn’t just a storage building or equipment room. But is placement directly under the coal trestle would limit its height, and the trestle structure itself would take up a great deal of space in which the building could occupy.

Here’s another look at the complete structure, “L” shaped wall and all. The trestle would have run along the top of both, ending at some point near the end of the concrete building. Its obvious from this drawing that the concrete wall was a later addition, added after the coal bins were already in place. Without any connection to the boiler house directly, I would guess that this building was not directly related to it, but perhaps served some type of auxiliary purpose. Perhaps we’ll never know.

For now the light had now completely gone, and our exploration of the Franklin Jr. complex had to come to a close. Hoping not to fall into an abandoned mine shaft, we took the long dark road back to our vehicles.


10 Responses to “The Wall”


Jay Balliet January 29, 2010

Does anyone besides me find it amazing that there appears to be a complete lack of grafitti on this. :)

Probably because it’s not as accessible as a lot of other ruins.

explorer January 29, 2010

For the most part copper country ruins are generally free from graffiti, probably for the same reason you mention. The highly tagged spots are those right along the highways (think Quincy Stamp Mill) and those structures made of concrete. I don’t think taggers like to paint on rock walls…

Chicaugon Lake Jim January 29, 2010

I’m amazed that it’s still standing, after all these years. Looks like I have another place to put on my list of must finds. Thanks, Mike.

ROC January 29, 2010

The building looks to have I-beam columns that supported steel trusses,you can see where the trusses were cut off,and than infilled with rock walls between the columns.That might be why it’s still standing.
How is the ruin identification book coming along? I’d like to be prepared for the nest time I come up exploring.

Gordy January 31, 2010

Really hard to believe that would be a building underneath the trestle, could you imagine trying to put a roof on it, if enough room for a roof was there. I think, since this boiler plant had been modernized and added to, I would guess those concrete walls were part of an add on to the coal bin for the boiler plant. On top of the concrete was probably a wood wall or it could have been for the supports for the rest of the trestle. The openings in the wall probably were not windows, maybe a way to get coal out of the bins (conveyor belt of some sort), don’t know why they would be on both sides though. Just looking at the thickness of the concrete walls at the window opening, makes me think it was to support a heavy load.

Adam from Detroit February 1, 2010

argh!! the “VIEW MORE” picture is not clickable!!
torture!!
:D

Dale Beitz February 1, 2010

“view more” pic works for me (Feb 1, 10:20AM EST)

Chicaugon Lake Jim February 1, 2010

I had wanted to comment on this last week, but my supervisor was around. She gets very angry when I’m cruising on the web during work, can’t imagine why?

Anyways, I’m truly amazed that a “pudding stone” wall of this height is still standing tall. Normally structures made of pudding stone do not survive the element of time, especially with a 100+ years of UP weather conditions.

“Pudding stone” was a term used by the Cornish miners. It refers to the color of the rock. It resembles the color of Yorkshire pudding. This is not like what we consider pudding today (ie. Jello). Yorkshire pudding was a real treat or delicacy to the Cornish. It is made from meat. I believe they wrapped it in fabric, like burlap, and cooked it by boiling it in water. It comes out pudding like in consistency. The color is a very dark reddish brown, just like the stone that they used in building the mine structures such as the wall above. Hence the term “pudding stone” buildings.

Oh, oh, gotta go. My supervisor is back and she don’t look happy. See ya!

Gordy February 1, 2010

That “view more” didn’t work for me Saturday either, but it did today

Adam from Detroit February 2, 2010

ah ok, working fine now!
thanks!