Facades (p8)

Moving on to the 200 block of 5th Street we start to get into the more interesting stuff. The first two blocks of 5th seem to have survived over the years in much better shape then the blocks that follow. Sitting at the Corner of Oak and 5th sits a little flower of a building which coincidentally now houses a flower shop. I’m not sure if that was the building’s original intent for its occupants, but it sure seems to fit in nicely with the theme. You can get an idea from the photo above, but a closer look is required to get the full impact.

A closer look at the main double window on the buildings front reveals a line of plant/flower-like tiles flanking each side. This flower theme is prevalent across the buildings upper facade, almost to the point of overkill. Everywhere you look these tiles show their heads.

This is a close up of those tiles around the windows themselves. There are only three different patterns, but they repeat themselves in a patter around the window. These tiles are painted red to match the brickwork, but there are other tiles with a different look found on the building. You can see a hint of one to the left in this picture.

Besides being around the windows, these flowers/plants are found along the edge of the building as well. They seem to be sprinkled wherever they could squeeze them in – around windows, on edges, between windows. This overkill seems to suggest the building had some purpose in mind when it was built (flower shop perhaps?) or perhaps there was a sale on flower/plant tiles.

Besides the tiles, the windows are also emblazon with more details like this sunburst header, dentil pattern and more flower/plant like etchings.

The building’s cornice spouts these turret like extensions spaced evenly across it. This one sits on the building’s corners. There are also a few spaced along the buildings top as well with a slightly different design.

And here’s one of them. What do you know, a flower/plant like design. Moving on.

Next: the Rowe Furniture building…

4 comments

  1. well i dont know about mass production PER SE, but you are right, these sorts of things were not necessarily the direct product of the architect’s hand, though they were made “by hand” by some type of contractor, often en-masse. and decorative elements on blgs often were templates from catalogues of some sort.

    though in the case of the Wayne County Training School, it really was a custom job, and a one-of-a-kind. though similar to many, ive never seen another structure that had the exact style of terracotta ornaments. every minute detail was drawn up in the architect’s blueprints!

  2. Adam..
    Then those things were most likely mass produced, and sold through some type of architectural catalog. (or maybe just the Sears catalog). While the buildings all look nice, once you start to look more closely like I have done and you start to see repeated elements between buildings; similar cornices, similar terra cotta pieces (like here) and other similar brick or sandstone work. I assume that being this far north, most of these embellishments were imported and not made locally. This probably includes the masonry work as well. I bet a lot of workers came up from lower Michigan (even detroit) to build the buildings up here.

  3. Adam from Detroit

    nice.
    i have a square tablet of terra cotta from the demolition of the Wayne County Training School (RIP, 1924-74), which has a similar floral motif to it.
    there’s nothing as cool as those old terracotta details.

  1. Pingback: Oak Street 500

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>